href

The Boston Review has published a forum on utopian visions for what AI could be. The introductory essay by Evgeny Morozov appears along with responses by Brian Eno, Audrey Tang, Terry Winograd, Bruce Schneier & Nathan Sanders, Sarah Myers West & Amba Kak, Wendy Liu, Edward Ongweso Jr., and Brian Merchant. In his opening salvo, Morozov poses the following "radically utopian question":

There’s relatively little effort to think about just what AI’s missing Other might be—whether in the form of a research agenda, a political program, a set of technologies, or, better, a combination of all three.

To close this gap, I want to offer a different way of thinking about AI and democracy. Instead of aligning with either the realists or the refuseniks, I propose a radically utopian question: If we could turn back the clock and shield computer scientists from the corrosive influence of the Cold War, what kind of more democratic, public-spirited, and less militaristic technological agenda might have emerged?

Morozov’s own sketch of an alternative path for AI draws on projects from the 1960s and 70s, including Project Cybersyn and the Environmental Ecology Lab. In his response to the other forum contributions, Morozov stresses that "The promise of technological alternatives lies not in replacing Silicon Valley’s digital imperialism with local variants but in reconceptualizing technology’s role outside the logic of capital accumulation."

In their introduction to a special issue of the International Journal of Cultural Studies, Thomas Poell, Brooke Erin Duffy, David Nieborg, Bruce Mutsvairo, Tommy Tse, Arturo Arriagada, Jeroen de Kloet and Ping Sun reflect on Western universalism and U.S.-centrism in platform studies and how they can be challenged:

Central concepts in the field … bear a strong imprint of Western institutions, cultural practices, and ideals. Research on the US, in particular, has informed how we approach and subsequently theorize the institutional dimensions (e.g., platform economies, infrastructures, and governance), as well as the cultural practices (e.g., labor, creativity, democracy) of platform-based cultural production. However, as the contributions to this special issue demonstrate, we cannot simply apply these concepts to cultures of production around the globe. There is bound to be friction between how, for example, platform economies and labor markets are understood from a US perspective and the lived experiences of social media creators in Brazil, Nigeria, or India.

Rest of World partners with the Henry Luce Foundation to tell stories about how technology is changing religious faith around the world:

This illustrated storybook represents a broad spectrum of themes and trends playing out across a number of religions and countries that include Hindu temples made by 3D printers to priests that dance on TikTok. They speak to the unraveling tensions of our time as people turn to technology to simplify their lives, search for answers, or find platform-born fame.

From Kate Crawford and Vladan Joler, who previously collaborated on Anatomy of an AI System, this visualization explores the mutual shaping of social structures and technological systems since 1500.

The aim is to view the contemporary period in a longer trajectory of ideas, devices, infrastructures, and systems of power. It traces technological patterns of colonialism, militarization, automation, and enclosure since 1500 to show how these forces still subjugate and how they might be unwound. By tracking these imperial pathways, Calculating Empires offers a means of seeing our technological present in a deeper historical context. And by investigating how past empires have calculated, we can see how they created the conditions of empire today.

Make sure to check out the five-minute audio tour.

In Time Magazine, Petra Molnar discusses her research on border technologies:

We need stronger laws to prevent further human rights abuses at these deadly digital frontiers. To shift the conversation, we must focus on the profound human stakes as smart borders emerge around the globe. With bodies becoming passports and matters of life and death are determined by algorithm, witnessing and sharing stories is a form of resistance against the hubris and cruelty of those seeking to use technology to turn human beings into problems to be solved.

The Association for Progressive Communications newsletter covers community networks from Colombia to Nigeria:

By being rooted in their own communities and encouraging collective articulation, a community network can became a catalyst for rethinking digital spaces and build more inclusive practices, taking into account, say, inequalities of gender, race and those that impact people with disabilities – as the pieces collated for this issue show.

In a contribution to a series of essays on Silicon Valley for the venerable academic blog Crooked Timber, Tamara Kneese writes about being an ethnographer in the world of tech:

What do the stories of the many generations of ethnographic researchers who joined and sometimes left the tech industry have to tell us about how Silicon Valley ideologies are taken up, embedded, and contested in workflows and products? How do the collected personal stories, or oral histories, of UX researchers interface with those of tech campus janitors and engineers? And is there something valuable that can be learned from their varied experiences about the sometimes ambivalent relationships between research, work, and collective action?

The introductory post to the series (with links to all contributions) penned by Henry Farrell can be found here.

Melissa Heikkilä reports on a new tool for artists for MIT Technology Review:

A new tool lets artists add invisible changes to the pixels in their art before they upload it online so that if it’s scraped into an AI training set, it can cause the resulting model to break in chaotic and unpredictable ways. …

Nightshade exploits a security vulnerability in generative AI models, one arising from the fact that they are trained on vast amounts of data—in this case, images that have been hoovered from the internet. Nightshade messes with those images.

The Thesis Whisperer on social media for academics – and why it may be a good idea to step away:

Telling academics they can achieve career success by using today’s algorithmic-driven platforms is like telling Millennials they could afford to buy a house by eating less avocado on toast. It’s a cruel lie because social media is a shit way to share your work now.

Not a little bit shit either. Very shit.

In this new comic in The Nib, Tom Humberstone explains what the Luddites can teach about resisting an automated future:

In truth, the Luddites were skilled with machines. They were simply fighting for better workers rights.